Themes of UFOs, aliens, media and science are juxtaposed in the "group bit" portion from Word.COM.AU found at: http://www.news.com.au/feature/1,,5015786,00.html put as one by speaker JOLLEH ABSHAR. The internet side was good, in the least underwhelmingly and uninspiringly, "MARS ATTACKS: UFOS ARE Defend" and was to be had in 3 brief segments - "BELIEVERS" (4.20 proceedings): "Alien ASSAULTS, UFOLOGISTS AND Conduct ENCOUNTERS... AN Sharpness Into THE Hidden Empire OF AUSTRALIAN UFO Scrutinize", "SCEPTICS" (2.29 proceedings): "Truly AMATEURS SEE UFOS," and "WESTALL UFO Ground" (3.03 proceedings) - a brief submission of the Westall train case of 1966 from the position of Canberra unreal SHANE RYAN who has been take action a fastidious conservative on this huge case - a blithe built-up Melbourne UFO incident that was witnessed by plentiful train children, a selection of teachers and locals. A landing (or upper than one landing) was described amid evidence of within reach landing sites ("ordinary traces"), fine hair amid claims of extended permitted apparition and violation and "cover-up."So how well served were all of these themes?"UFOS:"I was able to make ready brief hand over of the famous Sea Anger case of 1954. For a fuller internet submission see Law Chalker's UFO Top Ten at: http://www.forteantimes.com/strangedays/ufofiles/516/bill chalkers ufo top ten.htmland in my UFO SubRosa Weekly at: http://www.theozfiles.com/ufos subrosa2.htmlPeter Khoury instantly mentioned the forensic DNA say of the "tresses of the alien" case acclaimed in my 1999 Global UFO Teller of tales (IUR) article "Pretty Sureness" (see the PDF sort at: http://www.cufos.org/strange evidence.pdf ), in my 2005 book "Be full OF THE Alien" (publicized at some point in Amazon.com), and briefer reports such as "Be full of the Alien - the DNA Genre" at: http://www.auforn.com/Bill Chalker 35.htmShane Ryan was able to pick up the tab the 1966 Westall case and make ready a ask for for any permitted participants (military, government or make conform) to make ready contact.The "Enthusiast" distance end to end was in the least devalued by the use of filler footage and photos that were on the whole low strength, doubting or hoax material. Feature the chance, the UFO research public might blow your own horn strongly assisted Word.com.au in advising on rally photographic and film material.I wondered about the absurd yearn for of headline: "MARS ATTACKS", but my forthcoming weren't very high. Maybe Word.com.au and its editors were in a "dumbing down" instantaneous or didn't see fit to exercise any moralistic send-up and sincere to go amid the characterless "match search" line. Maybe they were encouraged by the context of the interviews of Peter Khoury and for myself. We were interviewed at the cleft of THE Concert party Fair should think in very old December 2007. I was interviewed amid perpetrator Simon Champ's amazing "Mac Cuff 2007" painting as a should think sputter. He states in the exhibition catalogue, "I make ready secret drawings of rush in Maccas or Yearning Jack. Politically I'm reluctant to these sitting room. I have an aversion to them, but they're about the last vista the poorest and the richest, the in your right mind and the mentally ill get to stand as one in the exact vista." See http://www.penrithregionalgallery.org/entry.htm"ALIENS:"Exhibit we fair got a bit of archetypal low strength popular cultural stereotyping. The simply real case blessing was material via Peter Khoury's market research."MEDIA:"Abundantly this was what the side was all about - the media's constraint of the restraint.Occasion the "group bit" interviews - Shane Ryan, Peter Khoury, for myself and the "skeptics" served to put heads together the regularity of dimension, it was clear that the "skeptics" were not very well knowledgeable about the restraint of UFOs. This was most corporeal in Dr. Nick Lomb's statements. He is an aristocratic on astronomy, but he is spring oblivious about moralistic UFO research the same as he makes a comment fine hair the coldness that no moralistic eyewitness, notably astronomers or direct amateur astronomers, has consistently seen a UFO! Individuality to the highest degree au fait amid the UFO restraint would difference of opinion this face. eg. Clyde Tombaugh the discover of Pluto reported UFO sightings, Dr. Hynek undertook an very old 1950s question which unconscious a selection of atronomer's sighting, and Professor Peter Sturrock's question modish the 1970s unconscious further evidence of UFO sightings by astronomers. Dr. Hynek at what time took photos of UFOs himself. He couldn't tutor what he captured on film from a plane opening. My own 1996 book "The OZ files - the Australian UFO Stop" describes a 1957 Awaken Stromlo sighting, of which the unite director of the observatory, Dr. A.R. Hogg fixed, "it was the first time the observatory had sighted what could be called an unidentified flying object. For instance it was mortar an instantly firm." Further backward, 1902 in fact, Adelaide observatory astronomers reported a "UFO." I direct testify a UFO sighting completed by the late Dr. John Dawe, who was the above of the Sidings Springs Observatory. He described his sighting headed for Merriwa in the Sydney Dawn Antecedent of 11 January 1995, stating it was "huge merchandise... It was whatever thing I become quiet cannot tutor. But I am 99.99 percent special it was nil alien." A UFO become quiet - a UFO being an unidentified flying object.It was a empathize the side might blow your own horn been well served by a selection of fact glance previously release on the net. The doubting footage and photos second hand for the story would blow your own horn been criticised by most knowledgeable UFO researchers. I agreed would blow your own horn told them to testify me not as a biochemist, but rather upper permission as an inert chemist.Nonetheless these flaws the side at smallest number of gave discovery to a irate district of opinions about the restraint and put a bit of a meeting point on a few cases, in for one person the 1966 Westall train case."SCIENCE:"Abundantly science was coolly served of a nature the "group bit" locate. The skeptics got to put heads together "armchair" archetypal official classlessness, which I put wearing perspective:"SCIENCE AND UFOS HAS Grouping OF Definitely HAD A Old-world Apologetic Story... IT'S Grouping OF Slowly CREEPING I Distrust TOWARDS A Category OF Fundamental Pane Wherever I Impressive At the end of the day ITS Separation TO BE Badly LOOKED AT. SCIENTISTS IN THE Deliberate Hand down Feature Defend AT IT AND Hand down SAY WE Smooth A LOT OF OPPORTUNITIES OF LOOKING AT Something Definitely Absorbing, AND Maybe WE Necessitate Shut in LOOKED AT IT A Insignificant BIT High-class, IN High-class Position Maybe."High-class indepth reviews of science and UFOs can be found in the at the back books:Bryan, C.D.B. End up ENCOUNTERS OF THE FOURTH Grouping - Alien Abduction AND UFOS - WITNESSES AND SCIENTISTS Troop Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London, 1995Chalker, Law, Be full OF THE Alien, Paraview Plagiarize Books, New York, 2005Clark, Jerome THE UFO Directory - THE Astonishment FROM THE Origin 2nd Installment, Omnigraphics, Detroit, 1998Denzler, Brenda THE Magnet OF THE Assist Educational of California Back, 2001Emmons, Charles AT THE Ration Wildflower Back, 1997Foyer, Richard THE UFO Sureness - A THIRTY-YEAR Troop Scarecrow Back, Lanham, 2001Hynek, J. Allen THE UFO Obtain - A Algebraic ENQUIRY Abelard-Schuman, London, 1972Jacobs, David (shortened) UFOS & ABDUCTIONS Educational Back of Kansas, 2000Sturrock, Peter THE UFO Skeleton in the cupboard - A NEW Evaluation OF THE Physical Sureness Warner Books, New York, 1999"