Did The Raaf Investigate The 24 May 1965 Eton Ridge Case

Hi all,THE Splendid ETON Protrusion CE2 CASE:In a innovative post (clap in attendance) I located positive initial mortal on the 24 May 1965, Eton Protrusion, Queensland case. In that post I the same pondered the questions as to whether or not, the RAAF investigated the assistant.The 27 May 1965 "Ipswich Queensland Period" press release article I found on RAAF UFO files, all through its exertion on the assistant by stating "The sighting would possibly be investigated by the Air Haziness as were other sightings." Stage was no sanction cited as to who world power abide supposed this.This mystery was solved in the 27 May 1965 exertion which appeared in the "Brisbane Illustrative Place of duty" which stated "The sighting would possibly be investigated by the Air Haziness, as other sightings were, Mr Seymour supposed." Seymour was the Queensland Indigenous Boss of the central Government's Personnel of Public Aviation (DCA.)NICAP's "The UFO Campaigner", June-July 1965, matter, carried details of Australian investigator Paul Norman's on-site investigation. On layer 22 it reads "The evidence and the reports are being evaluated by the Splendid Australian Air Haziness." Notwithstanding, offer is no greatly cited for this damage.RAAF UFO FILES:A inspect of the RAAF's UFO files in the Home-based Archives of Australia exposed that the totally laud of this case was the referral of the more two press release articles to the Personnel of Air. The movie album to the articles, told that the nail clippings were from RAAF Look after Amberley (Queensland) and that RAAF HQ Successful Rank supposed "No action has been subjugated on the query at this sordid." This is all redolent, in fact, that the RAAF did not it sounds as if scrutinize the case.Put in at Archive SEARCH:Nevertheless at the Put in at Archive of South Australia the other day, I life-threatening to inspect copies of the Brisbane "Illustrative Place of duty" press release for dates after the 27 May 1965 article, to see if offer were any suggestion up articles which had been missed by past researchers. Steady offer was one. This appeared on layer 11 of the "Illustrative Place of duty" dated 28 May 1965. The article was snobbish "Scout about inwards the sphere,'" and read:"Mackay - Order Constable B Heart of Nebo, yesterday inquired inwards the reported landing of a secret sphere on Eton Protrusion, 40 miles from Mackay, on Sunday night.He supposed last night he would craft no annotation on his consequence until his report was submitted today to Mackay County Order Disdainful (Assessor T Boyle.)A Splendid Australian Air Haziness spokeswoman last night supposed the RAAF had not been asked to scrutinize the sighting.Eton Protrusion Smear Live licensee Mr Jim Tilse on Wednesday supposed he and two other men saw the sphere land. It was handout in shape and carried positive 30 lights."Whilst I checkered issues of the "Illustrative Place of duty" for assured days after this latest article appeared, I found no further articles occupational next to the assistant.COMMENTS:1. It would severe to me that no-one fitting reported the sighting to the RAAF, so the RAAF did not scrutinize. The lack of any investigation report on RAAF UFO files wires this conclusion.2. It may possibly the same be contingent that the query was not reported to DCA. This deduce have a spat from the fact that in the 1960's, any UFO report prepared to DCA was instinctively forwarded to the RAAF. The fact that offer is no report on RAAF files indicates that the sighting was not reported to DCA. This is supported by the fact that no such report appears on the to the point DCA UFO file. This deduce is opposite to the 27 May 1965 "Ipswich Queensland Period" press release article which stated "Mr Tilse...reported the query to the control and Public Aviation Personnel." The Brisbane "Illustrative Place of duty" story did not say that the query had been reported to DCA. Notwithstanding, each articles stated that Mr Seymour, the Indigenous Boss of DCA had not "...customary a report on the sighting." In beyond, the NICAP Norman article makes no laud of a report to DCA.This eccentricity is in disarray to theorize. Either Tilse did craft a report to DCA, or he did not.3. Somebody agrees that the Queensland Order force were contacted, and did clean out positive thoughtful of investigation. Once more, standard dummy run in the 1960's was that the RAAF commonly asked the control to take on interviews next to witnesses on its behalf. This happened, for generation in the 19 Jan 1966 Euramo CE2 case. It would clang in this generation that the control investigated by themselves, after the establish contacted them.Notwithstanding, I be grateful for of no investigator who has a simulate of the Queensland Order force report. Has any reader a copy?