Operation Lost Ball Ghost Balloons And Detective Meskell

Hi all,Domestic Records of Australia (NAA) file series A703 control symbol 580/1/1 segregate 7 has now been digitised, gallantry of Melbourne campaigner Paul Dean, and is now outdated for broadcast at the NAA website.CONTENTS:The digital simulate of the file consists of 371 pages, and covers the being 1966 and 1967 (for readers who are discerning of the 6 April 1966 Westall gathering, no it does not wear any jam on this case!)However, inter alia, it does have:* A 27 Nov 1966 observe from Eildon Block, Victoria where an orange/yellow light was reported travelling in a north-west enjoin. The RAAF approved the burrow of this report to either "shot lightning" or a "plasma." It basic be noted that very few of the thousands of UAP reports finished to the RAAF standard this "stain."* A 30 Dec 1966 sighting from a ship at sea, of UAP travelling ESE at supersonic speed, parallel to the horizon. At smallest four groups, of altered objects per group, were seen. Each one object was around and showed light streams behind.* On 15 Feb 1967 a man in a car north of Townsville reported seeing a gloomy triangular object in the sky travelling SW to NE at an harsh greatest of 20,000 to 30,000 feet, in a typical walk. The RAAF found that the distinct well-defined aircraft in the area was a Pan Am aircraft which wasn't the object seen.* A see of a mystery "Act Lost-ball." A man found an local object on his property in a ride. A file detect states that the material was handed to "...a Mr Mills at the Partition of Present Perth who was inoperative by NASA as the W.A. Consumption Weight for Act Lost-ball." A search of the NAA website and the Internet, found no information at all about an Act Lost-ball. Lay claim to any blog readers always stem straddling it?* A air of a telex comatose 18 Apr 1967 from "Emerge Canberra" which I understand to be the Partition of Emerge Contact, Canberra, to the Partition of Cordial Aviation, Melbourne; the Melbourne Organization of Meteorology, and the Partition of Air. It was headed "Phantasm balloons." It admittance "Just starting out initiation on 27 Reveal -no. 91022, predetermine DDD, transmitting on 15022 kc/s." As I had not in advance heard of "Phantasm balloons" I plaid the NAA for files. I found distinct one, file series A432 control symbol 1971/15 barcode 9009307, Canberra office, reputation "Not yet Examined." Its star is "Agreement in the midst of Associated States Position for release of "apparition" balloons from Darwin." The file belonged to the Deputy Circlet Solicitor's office, Canberra. An Internet search found that "The Widespread Preset Sounding Regularity (Phantasm) program was an atmospheric stock research project for investigating the practical skill to channel weather data through thousands of simultaneous long-duration balloons." 231 Phantasm balloons were launched amongst Reveal 1966 and December 1969. The distend s were distinct flown not far off from the southern hemisphere, and one flight lasted over a see. For luxury on this program snap inside and inside. * A air of a observe, comatose 18 Mar 1967 from the Standardize Station at Goolagong to the Australian Excuse Prudence Organisation (ASIO) about "resonant deeds" centred not far off from a satellite re-entry.* A report of an object sighted on 22 Apr 1967 by a Police officer Meskell c/- the Standardize Station at Coolangatta, Queensland. He sighted a light travelling North which consequently malformed enjoin.Police officer John Meskell, was the central air of the reported Bougainville Reef aircraft, photographic case of 28 May 1965. To admittance about this case and Meskell's segregate in it, snap inside and inside. * A observe comatose 27 Jul 1967 from RAAF Corrupt Present Control to the Partition of Air in the midst of air of a scolding unadulterated by James E McDonald in Washington. The observe noted "Coach McDonald has scarcely been in Melbourne for discussions in the midst of the CSIRO on meteorological tribulations, and at the enormously time, took the stop to contribution an terrace to members of relations interested in UFO activity." To admittance this paper snap inside.END NOTES:Exhibit are constantly luscious bits of information to be found on any of the RAAF file series A703 control symbol 580/1/1 files. In a jiffy we are waiting for parts 12, 27 and 33-35 to be digitised, gallantry of a ask by Paul Dean.

Police Dash Cam Catches Ufo In Texas

A blaze of light shooting across the Texas sky got people talking, spurring the Federal Aviation Administration to examine stunning police footage.

The bluish-green streak seen as far north as Oklahoma City and as far south as Houston was "most likely" a meteor or piece of space junk, officials say, according to the "Austin-American Statesman".

FAA officials hunkered down with dashboard camera footage provided by Little River-Academy Police Chief Troy Hess, who observed the Wednesday night light show at Bell County town.

"It kept getting bigger, and the color kept changing," Hess told the paper.

Nearby residents in the small Texas town thought this bizarre flying object might be a distressed aircraft crashing or the sort of UFO visitation celebrated in Steven Spielberg movies, ITN reports.

The UFO talk crops up whenever these strange light shows occur. In September, a greenish streek spotted across several West Coast states opened the door to a lot of conjecture. That's expected, Edwin Krupp, director of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles, told "The Huffington Post".

"Certainly, it's correct to say that most people are not used to looking at the sky, not used to evaluating either brightness, distance or angular size in the sky, and therefore, have a very good chance of misidentifying objects or effects in the sky," said Krupp. "There are all kinds of explanations for UFOs, and the least likely is that they're spacecraft from another world."

[Via Huffington Post ]

TCC - Seems to be moving rather slow for a meteor or space junk to me,but with lights in the sky it is hard to say for sure.

60+ VIDEOS ">FACEBOOK.COM/THECRYPTOCREW

HAVE YOU HAD A CLOSE ENCOUNTER OR WITNESSED SOMETHING UNUSUAL?

Send us an Email

HELP US! HELP SUPPORT THE CRYPTO CREW

NOW YOU CAN GET OUR BLOG ON YOUR KINDLE!THE CRYPTO CREW BLOG FOR KINDLE

What Would Happen If We Are Contacted By Aliens

INTRODUCTION

What would happen if we were contacted by an alien race? There has always been and continues to be conversation on UFO web sites, forums, blogs, and scientific/political circles about this far-reaching subject.

It is certainly one that should be discussed; as such a disclosure would have a global impact on governments around the world, religions, stock markets, and most importantly you and me. What would happen depends on what type of contact is made; a verified signal from a distant location or an extemporaneous occurrence.

A DISTANT SIGNAL

Let's just theorize that we have a definitive, verified message from an alien race. It would probably come to the United States, right? Well, maybe, but maybe not. A message this important might be broadcast via some type of multi-language to all of the countries of the world simultaneously.

We might think that the United Nations would be in charge of handling an announcement. This makes sense, but then again, they don't represent all the peoples of the world. Should scientists be in charge? If so, which ones. What about politicians? Let's hope not. What about countries that muzzle their scientists? They would be left out of the loop.

IS THERE A PROTOCOL?

I can see a multitude of problems in dealing with such an earth-shaking announcement. You might wonder, and would probably think that surely, some type of protocol has already been developed for such an important happening. You would be right to a point.

This would be arguably the most important event in the history of the world. So what would happen, assuming that the first contact is based on a verified, extraterrestrial signal?

There is one group that has developed a first contact protocol; SETI. Although it might seem to be slightly biased, SETI believes that an announcement of alien contact falls under the auspices of scientists, since this is the group that is working on discovering an alien signal. And they have set up guidelines to react to the scenario.

There are over 200 people working on the SETI Project in the United States alone. If SETI would receive the first signal, a likely probability, here are their guidelines.

Any individual, public or private research institution or governmental agency that believes it has detected a signal from or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence (the discoverer) should seek to verify that the most plausible explanation for the evidence is the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence rather than some other natural phenomenon or anthropogenic phenomenon before making any public announcement.

VERIFIED EXTRATERRESTRIAL SIGNAL

Assuming that the signal is verified as being extraterrestrial, then:

Prior to making a public announcement that evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been detected, the discoverer should promptly inform all other observers or research organizations that are parties to this declaration, so that those other parties may seek to confirm the discovery by independent observations at other sites and so that a network can be established to enable continuous monitoring of the signal or phenomenon.

Parties to this declaration should not make any public announcement of this information until it is determined whether this information is or is not credible evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. The discoverer should inform his/her or its relevant national authorities.

After concluding that the discovery appears to be credible evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, and after informing other parties to this declaration, the discoverer should inform observers throughout the world through the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams of the International Astronomical Union, and should inform the Secretary General of the United Nations in accordance with Article XI of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the moon and other bodies.

Also see Alien - Human Contact, and Desiring Alien Contact.

Continue with Part 2

View the here

Two White Dots Floating In Day Time Sky Observed By Father And 2 Children

Location: Limassol, Cyprus. Bring about of the sighting: 16:30. By cosmos I am a star- and sky-gazer and by profession I am a physicist (specialty: plasma physics). That day me and my two simple daughters (8 and 7.5 days old), we came to the shoreline accurate Crowne Settle Stop. I was laying on my thorn and scrutiny the leftover of a summarize quality of a cloud. The sky was to a degree damp. The girls were sitting accurate me and playing in the record. I was gazing intensively in the sky first-class me. Then, all of agitated a very summarize okay spot of pale color appeared from one place to another first-class me in the blue sky accurate the cloud I was scrutiny. The sun was in the western quality of the sky at an adoration of approx. 55 degrees from the horizon. I can not tell the majority of the object, but it was not fair a finicky and was absolutely first-class the clouds, in my costing 2-3 km high. It started educational (or drifter) eastwards promptly after appearing. It was absolutely not an seaplane, in the function of repeatedly airplanes flying expound westwards from Larnaca airport are seen clear from this spot and paw marks of their fancy is at approx. 30 degrees to the paw marks of these unidentified objects. Then I dint that it may be a satellite(s), but I unexpectedly dismissed the dint in the function of it was a feathery day, and, constant, I can not see satellite in the sky lit blue by the okay sunrays. Nor can it be sure weather-control rise(s). And that's in the function of the phenomenon appeared brief under a detail eye. And, even more, in the function of after one the twinkling of an eye of tailing... several one, same-shape object brief appeared out of nowhere at the precise group about 10 degrees to the right (south) of the first one. And now they both were self-confident eastwards at the precise speed. Upon sighting of the first object I promptly called my daughters to watch it. They both saw it and were pleased, at the same time as we were scrutiny for a comprise day before the reports of UFO-sightings in the Internet. Acquaint with were other take possession of on the shoreline, but it seemed that nonentity else saw the objects, in the function of they were very summarize and educational among clouds. I feel like that this is sometimes the "border" of the UFOs: to give the impression of being on a important sky to use clouds as cover. In general, I reached for my android Samsung vivid call up and tried to film the run, but the luck slipshod, in the function of my wife took the connection hang (surrounded by her photos) out of the incident. We all were so distraught. For a the twinkling of an eye the two objects stimulated as one at the precise speed. Then the first one passed on and the beyond one continued the flight puzzled for several 2-3 report infertile it passed on aft a extensively cloud in the east at approx. 50 degrees first-class the horizon. It seemed to me as if they were (or are) monitoring the area... in shifts. I had a fastidious mental state (if one forgets about the filming collapse) and was very winning to accommodate seen the phenomenon from beginning to end time, in the function of I had 3 other UFO-sightings before and all of them were at night. Then I remembered what I alleged to be my night-sighting of UFO in this area about 8-9 days ago. That was a star educational very ineradicable eastwards in the exactly the precise paw marks. The rationale why I dint it was an UFO was the speed, for the object patterned half of the night-sky in approx. 15 seconds, stretch satellites move at smallest amount of 3 become old slower.

Reference: truth-just-ahead.blogspot.com

Ufos One Year At A Time 1949 The Norwood Searchlight

(FROM UFO Phenomenon at Close Sight)

http://www.ufologie.net/indexe.htm

On August 19, 1949, during the Jitney Carnival at the St. Peter and Paul Church in Norwood, Cincinatti Ohio, Reverend Gregory Miller, pastor of the church had purchased from army surplus, an 8 million candle power searchlight. Sergeant Donald R. Berger of ROTC of the University of Cincinnati would operate it. During the height of the festivities, at 08:15pm, Sgt. Berger's sweeping searchlight suddenly flashed across a stationary circular object in the sky. Reverend Miller and later others joined in and observed. This was only the beginning.

Reverend Miller took several photographs. He also took several films which show the object in the searchlight beam.

The filmings were done on request of Reverend Miller, by cameraman Sergeant Leo Davidson of the Norwood Police Department. Filming most of it on October 23, he used three rolls, 25 feet each and a Hugo-Meyer F-19-3" camera with telephoto lens.

Smaller triangle shaped objects seemed to come out of the larger main disc and fly around independently, about five objects to a group. They came down the beam and then turned off. The light beam BENT toward the discs when they were not in the path of the beam. Commenting on the smaller objects, Davidson said, "they were visibly the size of pinheads but they didn't have the intensity to register clearly on the film". He pointed out, however, that to the naked eye, he and all others present saw two groups of five small objects leaving the parent object, each, with halos, brighter than the searchlight beam. Said Davidson, "we watched each group fade out of view".

On October 23, 1949, again on the church's grounds, about 50 persons witnessed the phenomenon. Using a telescope, William Winkler, a businessman, said he observed one of the two groups of five smaller objects leave the parent object describing them as "triangular". Rev. Miller and his brother, Rev. Cletus Miller, agreed they were shaped "like the apex of Indian arrow heads". Robert Linn, Managing Editor of the Post, admitted later in an interview that he saw the searchlight beam "bounce off some definite object" but said the smaller objects were "something like bits of paper". However, Linn was concerned enough to join Reverend Miller in reporting the incident to Intelligence at Wright-Patterson AFB.

While no one among the thousands of Cincinnatians, including the experts, who saw the object, could guess its identity, Harry Mayo of the Post wrote a feature article April 6, 1950 under the headline, "What Glows on Here? Norwood Muses". At the close of the article, Mayo wrote, "Dr. D. A. Wells, professor of physics at the University of Cincinnati, and Paul Herget, U.C. professor of astronomy, took a look. Said Dr. Wells: "In my opinion its an optical illusion". Said Professor Herget, "It's not a fake. I believe it may be caused by the illumination of gas in the atmosphere. We need an explanation to squash people's fears."

The same Dr. Wells was there with camera and protractors and in discrete company of two 0SI members. Computations of the object's size were made and then confirmed by Dr. Wells. Like something out of Gulliver's Travels, the size was approximated to be 10,000 feet in diameter.

On July 1, 1994 the parishes of St. Elizabeth, St. Matthew, and

Sts. Peter and Paul formed one parish, Holy Trinity. The parish was

located on the sight of Ss. Peter and Paul Church.

Seargent Berger, who operated the searchlight on the first night of the sighting, cleverly realised this was a most unusual phenomenon and so decided to keep a written log of every occasion that the object made itself visible. This is his diary, as it was reproduced by Leonard H. Stringfield, CRIFO chairman and editor of Orbit Magazine:

AUGUST 19, 1949. Place: St. Peter and Paul Church, Norwood, Ohio. 2015 to 2300 hours. While operating for festival, picked up object at 1585 mils elevation. The object was stationary, appearing as glowing disc. When I moved the searchlight away the disc continued to glow. Estimated range: 4 or 5 miles. The sky was clear with thin haze at high altitude. I took no action, but next day articles appeared in two local papers re object.

SEPTEMBER 11, 1949.

Place: St. Gertrude Church, Madeira, Ohio. 1915 to 2315 hours. Picked up object at 15,000 to 20,000 ft. at 1620 mils elevation. The object disappeared within a few seconds, travelling straight up. I picked it up again at much greater altitude. Then, when I changed carbons I lost it again until 2115 hrs. As soon as it reappeared, I phoned Wright-Patterson Field. The sky was clear with no visible clouds or haze. Several thousand people also saw object.

SEPTEMBER 17, 1949.

Place: Milford, Ohio. 1900 to 2000 hours. Testing the searchlight about dusk, I had it set at 1600 mils. I could see an object which looked like a white glow. When I turned the light off, I could see nothing. I did this several times. As soon as it became dark I turned on the light at same elevation and caught object in the beam.

OCTOBER 23, 1949.

Place: St. Peter and Paul, Norwood. 1915 to 2245 hours. I turned on the light and picked up object at 1600 mils. Among those present were William Winkler, Father Gregory Miller, Robert Linn (Managing Editor, Cincinnati Post) and Leo Hirtl (Post reporter). Reverend Miller and Linn phoned Wright-Patterson and reported object to Intelligence Officer. About 2200 hours, two distinct groups of triangular-shaped objects seemed to come out of the main disc. Each group had about five objects. They came down the beam then turned out of the beam. The same performance was repeated about half hour later. The disc was still visible when I turned out the light for the night.

OCTOBER 24, 1949.

Place: St. Peter and Paul. 1915 to 2100 hours. Set light at 1600 mils. The object appeared immediately in the beam. ATIC agent and Lou Gerhart with me at the time. Held object in beam for about half hour until covered by clouds.

NOVEMBER 19, 1949.

Place: Norwood, Ohio. 1830 to 2245 hrs. At 1915 hours the beam of the light flashed on the object. Guiding the light back on the object, it then disappeared immediately. About a minute later I picked it up again much higher. The elevation was between 1605 and 1610 mils. Many witnesses, including William Winkler. Sky was covered with low broken clouds. At time objects appeared much brighter.

DECEMBER 20, 1949.

Place: Norwood, Ohio. 2015 to 2200 hours. Turned light on at 2015 and picked up object immediately. At first it was faint and small. As haze cleared, object brightened. At 2130 it got much brighter and spread out almost as large as beam, then disappeared. Present were D. A. Wells (Un. of Cincinnati physicist), Dr. Paul Herget (Un. of Cincinnati astronomer), two OSI members, Father Miller, the mayor of Norwood (K. Ed Tepe) and Reginald Myers.

JANUARY 11, 1950.

Place: Norwood, Ohio. 1930 to 2115 hrs. Turned on light, but didn't find object until about 1945 hours when haze blew away. Observed it for about 15 minutes, very clearly, then it dimmed. It was called to my attention that some smaller objects were passing through the beam. I saw at least two objects several times. Also present were William Winkler and M/Sgt. K. Ekleberry, M/Sgt. John Savage and Sgt. W. Pflueger of the Air National Guard.

MARCH 9,1950.

Place: Norwood, Ohio. 2000 to 2200 hours. About 2000 I picked up object with the light. About 2045 hrs. two small objects came out of the disc and it looked as if the disc was pushed out of the beam. In about ten minutes, the disc moved back into the beam. The sky was clear. Eleven people were present.

MARCH 10, 1950.

Place: Norwood, Ohio. 1900 to 2300 hours. Caught object in beam at 1600 mils. At 1945 hours the object moved up and across the beam and disappeared. Half hour later, object reappeared in beam in same position. Object stayed in beam until I turned light off for the night. Present were Father Miller, Capt. Wilks, K. Myers, Wm. Winkler and others. Capt. Wilks phoned Wright-Patterson Field. Capt. Wilks watched the object with glasses while I moved the light.

The Mayor of Norwood, R. Ed Tepe, now deceased, told in an interview in 1954 that he also was present during the computing and heard Dr. Wells confirm the object's approximate size. Tepe, who gave a unbiased report of his observations, firmly believed that the object was a solid round body. "It had ridges or ribbing, which were very discernible". Tepe also said that "when the searchlight beam moved away, the target was lost".

The Post, a Cincinatti newspaper, on August 20, 1949, had an article titled "Balls of fire hung over Cincinnati during the night", and the article quoted a Weather Bureau official: "One of our men who was working last night saw them. He said they looked like two weather ceiling balloons but they weren't moving. There was a wind of 25 to 32 miles an hour, so if they'd been balloons they would have moved". Another witness mentioned in the article saw "two balls of fire" about 4 a.m. "They seemed to grow dim, and then get bright again."

Another source says the Cincinnati Enquirer was called about the Norwood object and while they did not publish the story of the night's activities, they did admit receiving reports of unidentified lights in the sky - and beyond the vicinity of Norwood.

One photograph has been reproduced in "Inside Saucer Post...3-0 Blue," by L. H. Stringfield, Cincinnati, 1957. L.H. Stringfield thoroughly investigated this case for the NICAP.

The weather balloon explanation has been ruled out because on the first occasion at least, the object was totally motionless, while a 25 to 30 mph wind was blowing. Another explanation attempt indicated that a local theatre also used a searchlight on the first night, and that the two beams might have crossed and created a luminous phenomenon. This explanation is easy to dismiss, since it does not account for the duration of the sightings for months, for the smaller objects ejected by the larger one, not does this explain the numerous visual sightings over the area. No consistent other explanation attempt has been proposed. Among the most ridicule dismissal, there was the suggestion that the searchlight illuminated a "gas" in the atmosphere, and the suggestion that "it was geese".

I point out that this is a stunning series of sightings who have received very little attention, and no plausible explanation. The number of witness, the corroboration by photographic and filmed evidence, make it hard to dismiss. Unfortunately in those early days of "flying saucers" interest, no sophisticated data gathering was publicly done, which is a pity when one considers the very impressive details in the accounts. Anyway, there is only one rational explanation to he events: non-human flying devices were observed.

(From the UFO Casebook)

http://www.ufocasebook.com/1949norwoodufo.html

The Norwood Searchlight Incident of 1949, as it has been called, is an outstanding series of 10 visual sightings of a strange aerial object that took place in or near the Norwood, Ohio area from August 19th of 1949 to March 10th of 1950. The alleged observation of a massive object by searchlight operator Donald R. Berger, and meticulously detailed in his logs, remain one of the more curious events in UFO history. This case is exceptional not only because of the dramatic event reported, but also because of the caliber of witnesses involved. The series of incidents were said to have been witnessed by civilians, by clergy, by scientists, by police officers and military officials. Photos were taken on October 23, 1949 by Norwood Police Sgt.Leo Davidson, and 2 reels of 25-ft. motion picture film were kept in the possession of Reverend Gregory Miller, last seen at WCPO Channel 9 TV studios in 1952. Still frames from the movie film were given to investigator Leonard Stringfield and published in his book "SAUCER POST 3-0 BLUE." That photo from his book was scanned and enhanced for this report. Using this same photo, an earlier analysis had been made by Dr. Richard Haines.

(For photos and analysis, click HERE)

NORWOOD AND PROJECT GRUDGE

The Norwood case involves 10 visual sightings by multiple civilian, clergy, police, scientist and military witnesses over a 7-month duration, facilitated by the use of a powerful searchlight ran by Army Sgt. Donald R. Berger. The first sighting took place during "The Jitney Carnival" of 1949 and witnessed by hundreds The following morning, three local newspapers- The Cincinnati Post, The Cincinnati Enquirer and The Cincinnati Times Star- all had articles regarding 'strange lights' and 'comets seen over the city' from the previous evening. There was an explanation for the occurrence, according to one local newspaper. The Albee Theater in nearby Cincinnati, accompanied by the Ss. Peter "> source: Kenny Young ufo@fuse.net

http://www.nicap.org/norwooddir.htm

(From About Dot Com)

Between the dates of August 19 of 1949 and March 10 of 1950, an almost unbelievable wave of UFO sightings were logged in the Norwood, Ohio area. These visual sightings were of an odd, often stationary object which was witnessed by many ground observers. The Norwood searchlight incident was logged in detail by searchlight operator Donald R. Berger.

It is often said that a sighting's credibility is based upon the reputation of its witnesses. This case was reported by members of the clergy, scientists, police and military officials, as well as civilians. On October 23, 1949 Norwood Police sergeant Leo Davidson took photographs of the unknown objects, and Reverend Gregory Miller took 2 reels of 25 foot motion picture film.

Three Newpapers Carry Report: The very first reports of a UFO were made during the Jitney Carnival in 1949. There were literally hundreds of witnesses to strange lighted objects in the sky. The next day press reports were made of the sightings. The Cincinnati Post, The Cincinnati Enquirer, and the Cincinnati Times Star all carried a description of what occurred.

An Explanation Given: Some press reports minimized the sighting reports as nothing more than searchlight reflections from the cloud cover. Several churches and at least one theatre were operating searchlights on the first night of the reports. However, sightings were made all night long until daybreak, and it is very unlikely that the searchlights were operating the entire time. One official from the weather bureau made a report of an early morning sighting of "two objects" that appeared to be weather ceiling balloons, but they were motionless, despite winds up to 32 mph.

The Berger Logs: Refuting the searchlight explanations, Berger explained that even when he removed the searchlight from the sky, the brightly lit object was still visible. Berger would intrust his logs to Reverend Miller for five years. At that time, he gave them to UFO researcher Leo Stringfield. The photographs of the Norwood UFO have a very similar look to the ones taken during the Colares Island Incident

"Definite Object": Robert Linn, who was managing editor of the Cincinnati Post, along with Reverend Miller, both stated that Berger's searchlight had accidently found a "definite object, and the light only enhanced its view from the ground. They reported this to Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. Although many reports were made of the unusual objects, Project Grudge would not investigate the case, either from lack of funds or lack of interest.

2014 Ufos Ufo Sighting In Oak Hill

UFO Detection IN OAK Get up, OHIO ON OCTOBER 13TH 2014 - Boss OF THEM Then I May perhaps Record WOULD Hitch Group ALOT Then Lay a hand on SEPERATING BUT WOULD Halt TO FLY N SYNC Significantly Fantastic

Was the strangest thing I always observed couldn't go confidential at first in addition to I got a division spooked at the end of the day perfect previously appearing in. Particular objects all over sky reliable perfect now sync but seperated others flying soley. A number of clustering in cooperation to form one gargantuan but dim lights manufacture it very wavering to see. To the same extent the moon in the end widen out more or less 11pm ended it meaningfully easier to see but the dim ones calm very wavering to see sometimes they would Dias a pee red fine scarcely to show previously up seconds in imitation of. At one objective I witnessed a special UFO go very quickly nearing as if it were a sinking star how they become visible neglect a rope underneath in addition to fading scarcely to rematerialize seconds in imitation of. Besides looking in the inaccessibility arrived leaves a special red tawny which appears to be facade of the the UFO was at eye rank all other lights respect off so red tawny light appeerd meaningfully snooty brighter. At this time offering are calm to oodles to count all over the sky nearing looks as whereas they offering focusing on moon yet calm perfect more or less sky. Significantly extraneous.

New 2014 UFO Detection

Credit: MUFON

- - - Any included Media: http://bitly.com/1p82relAny reappearance, in facade or in crude, is proscribe without range of copyright casing. Email District Supervision for study, interpretation or questions.

Ufo Spottings On Central Coast Of Nsw

THERE'S SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENING IN THE SKIES OVER A LITTLE PATCH OF OUR PRISTINE HOLIDAY COAST.

The suburbs around Gosford, on the Central Coast, are the state's biggest hot spot when it comes to UFO sightings, with dozens of seemingly authentic cases reported every year.

Each month, as many as 30 people turn up to meetings to share their UFO experiences.

UFO Research NSW secretary Joann Kanda, who helps organise the meetings, saw what she believed was a UFO near her home at The Entrance in the mid-1990s.

"It was just a sort of a glowing light in the middle of the night," she said.

"The dogs made a strange noise and I got up. There was something up in the sky with a greenish glow."

The region was the scene for one of Australia's most baffling UFO cases - a series of sightings in 1995 and 1996 - that were reported by police and many other credible witnesses.

Residents have told of seeing shiny, spherical, illuminated UFOs that often hovered above water.

UFO Research NSW's Doug Moffett said UFOs were commonly spotted over water or near power plants and the Central Coast had plenty of both.

The geography of the Central Coast may also play a part. It is heavily populated in parts, which means there are people around to spot UFOs, but still isolated enough for them to be visible in the night sky.

"What UFOs do is, largely speaking, covert in nature. They're obviously not landing at the steps of the Opera House and saying, 'Take me to your leader'," Mr Moffett said.

The UFO and Paranormal Research Society of NSW said the Blue Mountains also figured heavily in UFO sighting reports.

A group of enthusiasts spent the weekend in the mountains searching for UFOs they say visit the area each year in the last week of March.

One of the group, who declined to be named, said that in past years the craft had appeared above the Burragorang Valley, beyond Jenolan Caves, and were seen to hover for some time.

Several readers have reported seeing UFOs near Wollongong a week ago.

Source: aquarius-project.blogspot.com