skip to main |
skip to sidebar
NASA's Voyager 1 spacecraft was launched in 1977, and, currently, is the furthest man-made object from Earth. Recently, it reached the furthest edges of our solar system, an area that scientists believe is the final barrier the craft needs to pass through before reaching interstellar space. When that happens, it will be the first ever man-made object to leave the solar system.
According to NASA's report, Voyager 1 reached the "magnetic highway" region for the first time in July of this year and has solidly been in that region since re-entering in late August. The area is known as a "magnetic highway" due to the Sun's magnetic field lines lining up interstellar magnetic field lines in the area where Voyager 1 is currently located. Once Voyager 1 leaves the solar system, scientists predict that the direction of the magnetic field lines will change, making it clear when we've finally sent a man-made object into interstellar space.
"ALTHOUGH VOYAGER 1 STILL IS INSIDE THE SUN'S ENVIRONMENT, WE NOW CAN TASTE WHAT IT'S LIKE ON THE OUTSIDE BECAUSE THE PARTICLES ARE ZIPPING IN AND OUT ON THIS MAGNETIC HIGHWAY," said Edward Stone, a Voyager project scientist from the California Institute of Technology "WE BELIEVE THIS IS THE LAST LEG OF OUR JOURNEY TO INTERSTELLAR SPACE."
As for when Voyager 1 might make it out of the solar system, Stone believes it should break free within the next "couple" years.
Right now, the Voyager 1 is aout 11,475,200,000 miles from Earth. There, it takes over 17 hours for signals to reach Earth. Currently, the craft is still powered by it's solar panels, and sends back data about the number of charged particles it finds. After it leaves the solar system, the craft will slowly loose power until it dies and stops sending data. However, the craft will continue moving. The lack of gravity, or anything, outside the solar system means there is no friction to slow it down. So it will just keep floating and floating until it hits something, somewhere.
LRO spacecraft has obtained Photosunusual structures on the lunar leave-taking. They show you thatsurfacesatellites is a strong worry. Is impart a aspiration that it chutzpah be shabby to shreds?
NASA announced that a order of scientists analyzing images hard at it by the spacecraft Moon Astral Survey Orbiter found a insignificant, true trench systems on the leave-taking of the Earth's automated satellite.
The researchers phenomenon that these rifts that fashioned seeing that the crust of the Moon was in nation seats slow and shabby, causing killing and the killing of the real knock back the disturbance. It is familiar that the moon was hit by a Mars-sized object on our planet about 4, 5 billion go ago. The brunt lowly in a different place from the Earth's sphere, which was our automated satellite. So far, while, held that the moon fashioned originator acutely molten rock, which furthermore began to wave down. As a produce of cooling of the essence, the moon began to fright, and fashioned on its leave-taking "wrinkles". Based on the size of these structures, scientists violent that the emergency supply with the "starting point" of the moon, and its leave-taking was reduced by a total of about 90 meters. found rifts, while, shed new light on the origins of Earth's satellite. Exposed depressions fashioned up to 50 million go ago, which means that they are more accurately new structures on the lunar leave-taking. Sort a intensity of 20 meters and its depth is about 500 meters.
Such formation of land did not sheet as a produce of shudder of the object, but its development. According to astronomers, this is evidence that the moon is until now geologically brisk. What's better-quality, originator forming it rocks were not fit melted. The specter of firm minerals in the essence led to a automated satellite of the inn stretching of the crust and the formation of tectonic trenches. In the past it was awaited that the moon may be expanding. If it turned out that the satellite is falling to one side, the earth would be compromised.lunar truth moon landing
Remarkable
aliens
nibiru
end of the world
doomsday
judgement day
Important Links,Paste/click the get in touch with if you don't crass the images.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1284013/Do-aliens-live-Saturn-moon.htmlBe Very well.DavidSCIENTISTS Hear A 'HINT OF LIFE' ON SATURN'S MOON TITAN By Term paper Script RaconteurLast rationalized at 7:33 AM on 5th June 2010 Scientists convey found evidence that portray is life on Saturn's main moon, Titan. They convey naked clues that primitive aliens are source of revenue in Titan's attachment and feeding on fuel at the show. The extraordinary discoveries, ended using an orbiting spacecraft, are elsewhere in two isolated reports. Saturn's moon, Titan, pictured using ultraviolet and infrared cameras on lodge the space search Cassini. Scientists now draw that the moon may perhaps harbour life Realization from Nasa's Cassini search has analysed the complex chemistry on the show of Titan - the a short time ago moon known to convey a loving attachment. Its show is coated along with mountains, lakes and rivers which has led astronomers to snarl it the most Earthlike world in the solar system. Instinctive chemicals had otherwise been detected on the 3,200-mile roomy planet. But the liquid on Titan is not water but methane and the scientists theorize life portray to be methane-based. The first paper, in the story Icarus, shows that hydrogen gas indulgent down as a result of Titan's attachment disappears at the show, portentous it may perhaps be being breathed by alien bugs. The spare paper, in the Story of Geophysical Labor, reports portray is a lack of a certain chemical on the show, elder scientists to draw it may be being used up by life. Countenance familiar? An artist's performance viewing Titan's Earthlike show along with Saturn appearing mellifluously in the longest as a result of the stocky attachment Scientists had intended sunlight interacting along with chemicals in the attachment to bring about acetylene that gush down to area Titan's show. But Cassini detected no acetylene portray. Experts blab that portray may perhaps be other explanations for the argue. But subjugated in a group, they meet two exalted erode elemental for methane-based life to exist. Nasa astrobiologist Chris McKay said: 'If these secret code do suitable out to be a sign of life, it would be doubly thrilling because it would mimic a spare form of life unrestricted from water-based life on Land-dwelling.' Scientists draw that equally the Sun swells up, swallowing Land-dwelling, erode may perhaps be impeccable on a space heater Titan. Tutor John Zarnecki, of the Large Academy, said: 'We draw the chemistry is portray for life to form. It lone desires emission and sensitivity to kick-start the modus operandi. 'In four billion vivacity time, equally the Sun swells stylish a red giant, it may perhaps be paradise on Titan.'
"Character Credit: Palomar Observatory / Caltech"
No. At least, not yet, and I don't enfold it general feeling.
For a few months now, NASA has been hyping this morning's difficulty of the LCROSS spacecraft surrounded by a shadowed crater on the Moon. Countless websites (as well as this blog yesterday) accepted on information on how population surrounded by 10-inch or generous telescopes can watch the party, yet good at your job observatories surrounded by 200-inch diameter telescopes didn't see doesn't matter what unattractive. For example of this, lots websites, bloggers, and news casts maintain tinted the LCROSS passion as a shush and a bomb. This is as unclean and overblown as the predictions of spectacular fireworks were.
I do anticipate now that NASA overhyped the LCROSS difficulty, at least in stipulation of what we strength be able to see from the Planet. But I do not anticipate the passion has unsuccessful. And that's what science is not about being paid the cunning we wish, it's about being paid the cunning fitting.
The LCROSS spacecraft's foremost passion was to glimpse for water on the Moon, expressly water congealed as ice in the permanently-shadowed craters at the Moon's poles. The come close to that the scientists who lead the passion chose was to difficulty a passed away whoosh engine hip a crater, and after that fly a spacecraft downward the barb of debris tossed hip space. The LCROSS spacecraft would consider the transcript and scheme of the barb in advance loud hip the Moon itself, distribution up a second barb of debris. Amid kismet, these plumes would alike maintain risen high copiousness for Earth-based telescopes to see; these telescopes can after that source methodical above data.
All of this worked bar numerous of the last slurp up. The passed away whoosh engine collided surrounded by the Moon, LCROSS flew downward the debris barb, ready section, and sent community to Planet in advance colliding surrounded by the Moon itself. LCROSS saw a flash from the first crash and did indisputably detect debris. Quite a lot of satellites, as well as LCROSS's sister spacecraft, the Cosmological Survey Orbiter (LRO), did detect the debris barb. But, at first peek, lots telescopes did not. Palomar did not, Hubble did not.
What does this mean? It means the debris barb (which we disclose was fashioned, what every LCROSS and LRO saw it) was not as big or concrete as passion scientists thought they strength see. This means the Moon is curious than we thought, at least in these polar craters. This means we're investigate something spontaneous. That's science! In fact, it's above sensational than if we'd seen a big barb of water taking into account we hoped, what it means we scientists were out of place and that there's something we calm stress to examine. That's not bomb, it's takeover.
Now, it calm may be practical to put-down bomb from the boasting of success. Maybe we'll examine that numerous human mistaken belief was in the wrong for the lack of plumes. Maybe numerous PC ready a mess up on the function of the debris barb. Maybe the hoof marks of the impactors was miscalculated. Maybe the out of place model of lunar ice and terracotta was hand-me-down. Maybe the Hubble was pointing unbiased the most minuscule component of a level in the out of place union. As the scientists tangled in the LCROSS squad consider their data, they'll be checking all of these bits and pieces, methodical as they glimpse for signatures of water and the other components of the debris plumes. But my gut hunch is that something went fitting.
So, what happened? Anywhere was the summit leg of water increasing from craters that haven't seen the sun in two billion years? I'm unbiased guessing, but I doubtful that big barb we were all expecting to see was one of the best-case scenarios. NASA most probably felt uncomplicated predicting the best-case section after the spectacular fireworks of the Passionate Substance passion, which hand-me-down the especially originally idea to uncertainty the comet Memorial 1. Involuntarily the claims of fireworks got the passion a lot of custody, but to the same extent the best-case section unsuccessful to arise, it led to a lot of be inherited. I delight what would maintain happened if NASA assumed, "You most probably won't see doesn't matter what, but there's a thorough skylight you'll see fireworks on the moon." Maybe not as much of population would maintain been inspection, but at least NASA wouldn't be the end of jokes this sunset.
Whatever problems they've been handed in ancestors outreach, the LCROSS squad has put as one an motivated passion that has, so far, worked. Velocity general feeling tell how considerably we'll examine from the passion. How considerably time? Having worked surrounded by plenty of data in my opinion, we're discourse months. The squad general feeling glimpse at the data, hiding place it, prison it, change it, and steer the data to its edge. Taking into consideration they are sure of what they've found, they'll tell us. So, we unbiased stress to wait. I disgust waiting.
In the swirling canopy of Jupiter's atmosphere, cloudless patches are so exceptional that the big ones get the special name "hot spots." Exactly how these clearings form and why they're only found near the planet's equator have long been mysteries.
"
The dark hot spot in this false-color image from NASA's Cassini spacecraft is a window deep into Jupiter's atmosphere [Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSI/GSFC]"
Now, using images from NASA's Cassini spacecraft, scientists have found new evidence that hot spots in Jupiter's atmosphere are created by a Rossby wave, a pattern also seen in Earth's atmosphere and oceans. The team found the wave responsible for the hot spots glides up and down through layers of the atmosphere like a carousel horse on a merry-go-round.
"This is the first time anybody has closely tracked the shape of multiple hot spots over a period of time, which is the best way to appreciate the dynamic nature of these features," said the study's lead author, David Choi, a NASA Postdoctoral Fellow working at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. The paper is published online in the April issue of the journal Icarus.
Choi and his colleagues made time-lapse movies from hundreds of observations taken by Cassini during its flyby of Jupiter in late 2000, when the spacecraft made its closest approach to the planet. The movies zoom in on a line of hot spots between one of Jupiter's dark belts and bright white zones, roughly 7 degrees north of the equator. Covering about two months (in Earth time), the study examines the daily and weekly changes in the sizes and shapes of the hot spots, each of which covers more area than North America, on average.
Much of what scientists know about hot spots came from NASA's Galileo mission, which released an atmospheric probe that descended into a hot spot in 1995. This was the first, and so far only, in-situ investigation of Jupiter's atmosphere.
"
In this series of images from NASA's Cassini spacecraft, a dark, rectangular hot spot (top) interacts with a line of vortices that approaches from on the upper-right side (second panel). The interaction distorts the shape of the hot spot (third panel), leaving it diminished (bottom) [Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/SSI/GSFC]"
"Galileo's probe data and a handful of orbiter images hinted at the complex winds swirling around and through these hot spots, and raised questions about whether they fundamentally were waves, cyclones or something in between," said Ashwin Vasavada, a paper co-author who is based at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., and who was a member of the Cassini imaging team during the Jupiter flyby. "Cassini's fantastic movies now show the entire life cycle and evolution of hot spots in great detail."
Because hot spots are breaks in the clouds, they provide windows into a normally unseen layer of Jupiter's atmosphere, possibly all the way down to the level where water clouds can form. In pictures, hot spots appear shadowy, but because the deeper layers are warmer, hot spots are very bright at the infrared wavelengths where heat is sensed; in fact, this is how they got their name.
One hypothesis is that hot spots occur when big drafts of air sink in the atmosphere and get heated or dried out in the process. But the surprising regularity of hot spots has led some researchers to suspect there is an atmospheric wave involved. Typically, eight to 10 hot spots line up, roughly evenly spaced, with dense white plumes of cloud in between. This pattern could be explained by a wave that pushes cold air down, breaking up any clouds, and then carries warm air up, causing the heavy cloud cover seen in the plumes. Computer modeling has strengthened this line of reasoning.
From the Cassini movies, the researchers mapped the winds in and around each hot spot and plume, and examined interactions with vortices that pass by, in addition to wind gyres, or spiraling vortices, that merge with the hot spots. To separate these motions from the jet stream in which the hot spots reside, the scientists also tracked the movements of small "scooter" clouds, similar to cirrus clouds on Earth. This provided what may be the first direct measurement of the true wind speed of the jet stream, which was clocked at about 300 to 450 mph (500 to 720 kilometers per hour) -- much faster than anyone previously thought. The hot spots amble at the more leisurely pace of about 225 mph (362 kilometers per hour).
By teasing out these individual movements, the researchers saw that the motions of the hot spots fit the pattern of a Rossby wave in the atmosphere. On Earth, Rossby waves play a major role in weather. For example, when a blast of frigid Arctic air suddenly dips down and freezes Florida's crops, a Rossby wave is interacting with the polar jet stream and sending it off its typical course. The wave travels around our planet but periodically wanders north and south as it goes.
The wave responsible for the hot spots also circles the planet west to east, but instead of wandering north and south, it glides up and down in the atmosphere. The researchers estimate this wave may rise and fall 15 to 30 miles (24 to 50 kilometers) in altitude.
The new findings should help researchers understand how well the observations returned by the Galileo probe extend to the rest of Jupiter's atmosphere. "And that is another step in answering more of the questions that still surround hot spots on Jupiter," said Choi.
"Source: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center [March 14, 2013]"
